Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Statutory Wills case study: Mavis' story

Mavis and Jack were married for over 60 years. They didn’t have any children together but stayed in touch with various nieces, nephews and cousins. Jack passed away in 2012. After his death it became clear that Mavis was struggling to live at home on her own and when she had a stroke she needed to go into long term care. She also lost the capacity to sign her own Will.

When Mavis went into care there was one particular nephew called Jonathan who checked in on her at least once per week to make sure that she had everything that she needed and that she was as comfortable as possible. Jonathan had been appointed as Mavis's attorney. He could see that Mavis's family home needed to be sold and when clearing the property he came across a copy of Mavis's Will. The Will was 15 years old and named some family members as beneficiaries who Mavis has had little or no contact with for the last 10 years or so. From letters stored with the Will he could see that Mavis had meant to update her Will but hadn’t got round to doing so before she had the stroke.

Jonathan contacted Wrigleys to ask if there was anything we could do to help. We made an application to the Court of Protection asking for Jonathan to be given the authority to sign a new Will for Mavis. The Court was happy that the Will was in Mavis's best interests. The gifts to the distant family members who hadn’t been in contact with Mavis over more recent years were significantly reduced and Jonathan became the main beneficiary under the Will. The Court agreed to do this as they could see that over the years Jonathan was the one who had maintained contact with Mavis and provided emotional and practical support to her.

The Court of Protection made an Order that the costs of the Statutory Will were to be paid for out of Mavis's money, not Jonathan's.

Jane Netting View Biography

Jane Netting

Direct Line: 0114 267 5621

Partner
Sheffield

Meet the team

04 Jun 2025
Alacoque Marvin Headshot

Martyn’s Law: What academy trusts need to know

Preparing schools for new security duties under the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025.

29 May 2025
Marie-Louise Hamilton Headshot

Celebrating five promotions across Wrigleys Solicitors

We’re delighted to announce five well-earned promotions, reflecting our commitment to nurturing expertise and supporting career progression.

22 May 2025
 Alexandria Evans Headshot

Part-time worker claims: part-time status must be the “sole reason” for less favourable treatment, EAT confirms

In this article, we look at the recent case of Mireku v London Underground Ltd [2025] EAT 57 and its impact on less favourable treatment claims.