Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588


Wife of a property developer held to a post-nuptial agreement

April 2015

In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a post-nuptial agreement signed by a wife at the request of her husband was binding.

The Judge said that "she would have to live with the post-nup as she had signed it of her own free will having received copious volumes of legal advice".

Caroline Hopkins had married a wealthy property developer in April 2009 although they had known each other for many years before that.  The marriage broke down and in August 2011, Mrs Hopkins signed a post-nuptial agreement in which she would acquire two properties and a car plus £75,000 in full and final settlement of any future claims.  Although she was advised by her lawyers not to sign the agreement, Mrs Hopkins said that she was quite happy with its terms and duly signed.  Some months later, Mrs Hopkins challenged the terms of the post-nuptial agreement and claimed that she had been put under undue pressure and had been exploited.  Unfortunately for Mrs Hopkins, the Judge rejected her claims and decided that Mrs Hopkins had signed the agreement freely and with full advice and understood that the agreement was a watertight and binding agreement.  The post-nuptial agreement was therefore upheld.

Post-nuptial agreements
Post-nuptial agreements, like pre-nuptial agreements, can be legally binding. 

Post-nuptial agreements do therefore have a significant role to play in asset protection and wealth preservation but it is clear that a party should not be forced into signing any such agreement particularly at a time when emotions are running high. 

Marie Louise Hamilton comments "This case is good news as couples need to be able to rely on the agreement."

"A post-nuptial, pre-nuptial or co-habitation agreement where both parties take independent legal advice are not something that parties should sign up to unless they want to be bound by the terms."

If you would like advice on the matters covered by this article, please contact Marie-Louise Hamilton or any member of the Wrigleys' Private Client team on 0113 244 6100.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Private Client team on Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors


April 2015


Marie-Louise Hamilton View Biography

Marie-Louise Hamilton

Managing Partner

10 Oct 2019

Female manager's shoulder massage of male team member was not sexual harassment

EAT upholds tribunal's decision that conduct was unwanted but not related to the claimant's sex

09 Oct 2019

Exciting times in York for community-led housing

There are a number of interesting projects happening in York at the moment, the most high profile of which are:

07 Oct 2019

Extinction Rebellion protests and employment law

What do employers and employees need to know about protests?