Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Japanese knotweed – have lenders been too cautious?

July 2019

We consider the recent findings of government research regarding the approach of UK lenders in relation to properties affected by Japanese knotweed.

What did the Committee conclude?

Japanese knotweed is certainly a headache for a property transaction; often creating delay, reduced valuations, extra expense and anxiety for a seller, and even causing some deals to be called off. We considered the risks of having Japanese knotweed on your land in our article, Alien Invasion: Japanese knotweed https://www.wrigleys.co.uk/news/property/alien-invasion-japanese-knotweed/  But is it as bad as we feared?

It seems that UK mortgage lenders may be taking too cautious an approach to the invasive plant. This is the conclusion reached by a parliamentary select committee, the Science and Technology Committee, who ensure government policy and decision-making are based on good scientific advice and evidence.  Their research suggests that physical damage caused to a property by Japanese knotweed is in fact "no greater than that of other disruptive plants and trees that are not subject to the same controls".

What do the Committee suggest?

When Japanese knotweed is identified then the RICS risk assessment framework for this issue is, to some extent, very helpful. Some lenders are content to see insurance-backed guarantees and solid treatment programmes put in place as recommended. Others however are taking a more abrupt view, relying on certain rules in the framework (such as the so-called 'seven metre rule') which do not always take into account the facts; such as the size of the infestation and realistic risk of damage. The Committee found that a more evidence-based and proportionate approach is needed to ensure that the impact on lending decisions is proportionate to the plant's physical effects and the current 2012 framework, by RICS' own admission, needs updating.

What are the next steps?

RICS are consulting stakeholders and looking at their policy to ensure it reflects up-to-date evidence. Defra has been tasked with reporting on what is done in other countries to address the nuisance. Further news from both is expected later this year which will be welcome news to affected homeowners. 

If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article further, please contact Alexandra SlaterRachel Meredith or any other member of the Wrigleys Property team on 0113 244 6100.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors

Rachel Meredith View Biography

Rachel Meredith

Partner
Leeds

Alexandra Slater View Biography

Alexandra Slater

Solicitor
Leeds

11 Nov 2019

Employee dismissed for refusing to go full-time was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against on grounds of sex

Employee made redundant after employer refused to allow her to continue to job share.

07 Nov 2019

Election 2019 Manifestos – What Can Schools Expect?

We look here at the manifesto pledges schools can expect to see ahead of the General Election on 12th December.