Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588


Send us an enquiry

A helpful case on business rates

10 April 2017

Community-led housing & other organisations welcome a common sense decision that business rates may not be payable during significant building works.

Business rates

Did you know that you may have to pay business rates on an old commercial property you are converting, even if you have obtained planning permission for residential use?  If a property has not yet been physically converted to residential use, then business rates could still be charged until the conversion work is finished.   There has been a useful case recently which indicates that this liability for groups (or in fact, any developer) could be mitigated as soon as works begin rather than once they are completed – a welcome decision for any group converting non-residential property into residential  premises.

The Supreme Court has ruled on a long running dispute about whether a property can be deleted from a rating list during significant building works.


Briefly, an office building was undergoing works involving returning it to a shell in order to create three new office suites. The ratepayer argued the property should be deleted from the rating list during the works as the property was incapable of beneficial occupation

The case was heard by the Valuation Tribunal initially and after 3 appeals, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the ratepayer’s appeal.


Generally speaking, this will be welcome news for community led housing groups converting office or other commercial buildings.  It means that buildings undergoing significant building works such as a refurbishment scheme or development to another use may not be liable to a rates liability whist the building is undergoing these works.

Naturally all cases turn on their own specific facts, so although this decision is helpful, community led housing  groups should take advice on their liability before budgeting for redevelopments

Case report: Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v SJ & J Monk (a firm) [2017] UKSC 14 (1 March 2017)


If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article further, please contact Emma Ridge on 0113 244 6100.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Charities and Social Economy team on Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors




Emma Ridge View Biography

Emma Ridge


29 May 2020

Government publishes new Covid-19 Job Retention Scheme Directions

Important considerations for employers who have decided to furlough staff

27 May 2020

When will changes to terms because of a TUPE transfer be void?

The key risks of changing terms on a TUPE transfer – even when they are beneficial to the employee.

26 May 2020

Community-led housing: What happens after Covid-19?

Our CLH team held a virtual social in May, the theme of which was what the future holds for the sector, in the aftermath of the Covid-19 epidemic.