Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Wife of a property developer held to a post-nuptial agreement

01 April 2015

In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a post-nuptial agreement signed by a wife at the request of her husband was binding.

The Judge said that "she would have to live with the post-nup as she had signed it of her own free will having received copious volumes of legal advice".

Background
Caroline Hopkins had married a wealthy property developer in April 2009 although they had known each other for many years before that.  The marriage broke down and in August 2011, Mrs Hopkins signed a post-nuptial agreement in which she would acquire two properties and a car plus £75,000 in full and final settlement of any future claims.  Although she was advised by her lawyers not to sign the agreement, Mrs Hopkins said that she was quite happy with its terms and duly signed.  Some months later, Mrs Hopkins challenged the terms of the post-nuptial agreement and claimed that she had been put under undue pressure and had been exploited.  Unfortunately for Mrs Hopkins, the Judge rejected her claims and decided that Mrs Hopkins had signed the agreement freely and with full advice and understood that the agreement was a watertight and binding agreement.  The post-nuptial agreement was therefore upheld.

Post-nuptial agreements
Post-nuptial agreements, like pre-nuptial agreements, can be legally binding. 

Post-nuptial agreements do therefore have a significant role to play in asset protection and wealth preservation but it is clear that a party should not be forced into signing any such agreement particularly at a time when emotions are running high. 

Marie Louise Hamilton comments "This case is good news as couples need to be able to rely on the agreement."

"A post-nuptial, pre-nuptial or co-habitation agreement where both parties take independent legal advice are not something that parties should sign up to unless they want to be bound by the terms."

Safeguard your assets and protect your future with expert pre- and post-nuptial agreements from Wrigleys Solicitors.

If you would like advice on the matters covered by this article, please contact Marie-Louise Hamilton or any member of the Wrigleys' Private Client team on 0113 244 6100.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Private Client team on Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors

 

April 2015

 

 

 

 
 
04 Jun 2025
Alacoque Marvin Headshot

Martyn’s Law: What academy trusts need to know

Preparing schools for new security duties under the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025.

29 May 2025
Marie-Louise Hamilton Headshot

Celebrating five promotions across Wrigleys Solicitors

We’re delighted to announce five well-earned promotions, reflecting our commitment to nurturing expertise and supporting career progression.

22 May 2025
 Alexandria Evans Headshot

Part-time worker claims: part-time status must be the “sole reason” for less favourable treatment, EAT confirms

In this article, we look at the recent case of Mireku v London Underground Ltd [2025] EAT 57 and its impact on less favourable treatment claims.