Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588


Send us an enquiry

When Granny’s gift backfired

05 July 2021

Sheila is the proud granny of Josh, who is a lovely, cheerful 21 year old, and she loves to spend time with him.  Josh has learning difficulties and is not able to work.  He lives in a supported living house with three other young men and has a support package. 

Sheila wants to make sure that Josh has money to do the things he loves.  He is very keen on bird watching and nature painting.  She decides to leave £30,000 to Josh in her Will.  She doesn’t mention anything to Josh or his parents as she wants it to be a surprise. 

Josh’s support package is paid for by a combination of the local authority and benefits that he receives.  His local authority care package and some of his benefits are means tested.  Unfortunately, Sheila’s kind gift means that Josh will lose all of his means tested funding.  He will be able to claim his Personal Independence Payment but will lose his Universal Credit, the benefits that go along with that such as free prescriptions, and his local authority funding.  Once the money he has goes down to £23,250 he will be able to re-apply for local authority funding although the package might not be as generous as it was when he applied first time round because the local authority are putting budget cuts in place.  He will have to wait until his money has fallen to £16,000 to be able to apply for Universal Credit again and won’t receive the whole amount until his money has fallen to £6,000.  If he tries to spend the money so he reaches those levels faster, he could be treated as still owning it.  To make matters worse, Josh isn’t actually able to manage £30,000 and so one of his parents needs to apply to the Court of Protection for authority to deal with his finances.  Granny’s gift has well and truly backfired. 

What should Granny have done?

Sheila should have left the money to a trust for Josh.  That could have been a discretionary trust set up under her Will or one that she set up in her lifetime.  Alternatively, she could have contributed to a trust set up by somebody else for Josh’s benefit.  That way the trustees would look after the money for Josh, it wouldn’t affect his means tested benefits or care package and it could be used for what Sheila intended all along; to pay for trips away for Josh for bird watching and painting and for art materials. 

To learn more about how to provide for your vulnerable relatives, you can read more in our 'Wills and Trusts for Vulnerable People' information sheet. 

If you have any questions or we can assist, please contact Lynne Bradey or any other member of Wrigleys Court of Protection team on 0114 267 5588.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Court of Protection on Twitter here.

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors. 




Lynne Bradey View Biography

Lynne Bradey


22 May 2024

Beware of Companies House scam letters

Fake Companies House letters are asking for payments via QR code. We urge clients to stay vigilant and to be alert to these fraudulent requests.

16 May 2024

Considering the validity of existing LPA’s

Further to the recent decision in TA v The Public Guardian [2023] EWCOP 63

14 May 2024

Office for Students opens consultation on freedom of speech guidance

The latest consultation follows previous consultations on the new OfS complaints scheme and its proposed approach to regulating students’ unions.