Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588


Send us an enquiry

The Conservative plans on social care – the second big question

19 May 2017

The Conservative party manifesto includes a proposal to raise the limit for means testing of capital to £100,000. Wrigleys consider the implications.


  1. The Care Act 2014 requires that local authorities shall:

    1. Assess the needs of people who appear to them may have a need for social care.
    2. Decide which of those needs are eligible for support.
    3. Prepare a care plan as to how those eligible needs will be met.
    4. Determine a personal budget for the costs of the care plan which the local authority will meet.

    The average house price in England is £216,000 which means that large numbers of people living in their own homes will self fund their care. In these circumstances the Care Act process set out above will not apply.

    For this group, there will be no such thing as needs which are eligible for local authority financial support.

    This leads to 2 consequences. Either,

    1. Home owners will take advantage of private sector financial products such as equity release and then commission their own care.


    1. The local authority will still commission and pay for the care but take out a land charge against the property to recover this when the property is sold

    The first will mean that the assessment and commissioning of care at home is taken outside of local authority social services input altogether.

    The second, in consequence of anti-avoidance rules, will mean that local authorities will effectively sequester the homes of those needing care, rationing the extent that they can use equity in their homes to pay for care and determining whether other uses they may have for that equity care are acceptable. On this scenario, conventional equity release will become a thing of the past as it will be regarded as an avoidance measure.

    The current deferred payment agreement whereby residential care home fees are secured against a property is an example of what will be applied to homes where the adult is still resident. It seems likely that many people will refuse to sign this and care will not be provided.

For further information about the Wrigleys Health & Care team please click here

Health and Care Solicitors


If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article and Wrigleys service further, please contact Austin Thornton on 0114 267 5588.

To keep up to date with further updates from the Wrigleys Health & Care team, you can follow on Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors


Austin Thornton View Biography

Austin Thornton


29 Sep 2020

How should we deal with flexible working requests to work remotely?

Key considerations for employers dealing with requests to work differently in the context of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

28 Sep 2020

Video Wills

This is an attempt to make it easier for people to record their final wishes whilst continuing to protect the elderly and the vulnerable.

28 Sep 2020

The new Job Support Scheme: what is it and will it be enough?

Employers must fund at least 55% of normal wages if claiming under the new scheme.