Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588


Send us an enquiry

Should my client know the value of their damages award?

18 March 2024

Why is it such a big issue and what has the Court said?

The question of whether a person who lacks capacity should know how much their damages award is has been rumbling on for a few years now.

The Courts have been realising that sometimes a person would be better off not knowing how much compensation they have receivedSome people will be very sensible with the information and keep it privateSome people aren’t able to do that and can cause problems for themselvesWhat about John who goes into the local pub and says quite loudly he’s a millionaire and by total coincidence seems to attract a lot of unsuitable women who latch on to him and then leave him once they realise there is a Deputy in the way of their access to cashWhat about Jenny, not given to broadcasting the amount of her award in the pub but worried that when she comes under pressure from her less than well-meaning sister to say how much she has, she won’t be able to resist that pressure.    

Sometimes the litigation Court will be so concerned about what would happen if the client knew the size of their award that they will make an Order as part of the claim that they shouldn’t be told.   

In this case the Court looked at two clients, both looked after by the same trust corporation DeputyThe Court had decided that when assessing a person (P’s) capacity to make the decision about whether they should be told the amount of their award or not, the Court needed to look at: 

  1. The nature of the information in question,  
  1. The risk of obtaining it,  
  1. The risks of not obtaining it, 
  1. The benefits of obtaining it, 
  1. The benefits of not obtaining it. 

The Court said that “when assessing P’s capacity to take the decision, her ability or the extent of her ability, to recognise, retain and weigh the above questions and specifically to recognise, retain and weigh her own vulnerability and it’s potential consequences, will frame the scope of the decisionThe Court went on to say that if the client is able to recognise these problems and vulnerabilities, retain the information and weigh it up then she is likely to have capacity to make this decisionShe is still vulnerable and may make unwise decisions in the future and be exploited but the Court’s job is not to wrap her life in cotton woolThe Court said “a life wrapped in cotton wool is a restricted and diminished one”. The Court then applied that to the two cases.   

CK does not recognise her own vulnerabilityShe is sometimes careless about what she posts on social media about money and she lacks insight into the need to protect herself from financial abuseShe has though worked out for herself pretty accurately how much the damages areThe Court found that CK can’t make the decision for herself whether to know the amount of her damagesThe main reason for that is because she doesn’t recognise her own vulnerabilityHowever, because she has already worked out what her damages probably are, the Court didn’t feel that knowing the precise amount would make her much more vulnerable.    

NJ on the other hand does not understand figures or the relative value of money and doesn’t recognise the full extent of her disabilityShe has actually said she doesn’t want her brother to find out about the value of the award but can’t express why when askedShe wants to have land to keep horses and space for her dogs and to have support and be settledThe Court felt that she was very vulnerable to exploitation and noted that her brother was described as being addicted to heroinShe doesn’t understand her own vulnerability but even if she was told the amount of the award, she wouldn’t understand the size and value of itThe Court decided that she lacked capacity to make this decision and also should not be told of the amount of her award.   

Very helpfully for Deputies, the Court said that an application to Court to decide this issue was not necessary in every caseThe Court said that sometimes the decision would “be clear, perhaps even just common sense”. In some cases though because the issue is difficult, an application will need to be made to the Court.   


This is a very helpful decision for DeputiesIt sets out what we need to consider when making a best interests decision about whether somebody should be told the size of their award.   

It is vital to remember that if P has the ability to make that decision then whether the Deputy thinks they should be told the size of the award or not, they can decide whether to know for themselvesThe Deputy should check with them whether they want to know of course as some people will have weighed up their own vulnerability and decide they would rather not.   

This also gives comfort to Deputies who have clients who do not know the size of their award for very good and non-contentious reasonsSome clients just aren’t able to take in the information and others would perhaps seize on a global figure but without the understanding of what that award needs to do for the rest of their lives.   

There was a suggestion that whether a person should know the size of their award was a welfare decision and not something a financial Deputy should take to Court but the Court made it clear that it was in fact a financial decision.   

So the steps are, work out whether you client has capacity to make the decision for themselvesIf they do, ask them whether they want to be told, if they don’t then make a best interests decision whether they should be told but if this is complicated or contentious then take it to the Court of Protection. 

If you have any questions or we can assist, please contact Lynne Bradey or any other member of the Health and Care team 0114 267 5588.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Court of Protection team on X.

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. The law stated is correct at the date (stated above) this article was first posted to our website. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors.



Lynne Bradey View Biography

Lynne Bradey


17 Apr 2024

Independent schools’ development: policies for navigating the modern fundraising landscape

Independent schools face fundraising challenges in a tough climate. Learn best practices for compliant and effective fundraising policies.

09 Apr 2024

Charities Act 2022: new provisions introduced

What do the latest provisions mean for your charity?

09 Apr 2024

Cohousing Series: Navigating the Planning System

This article is the latest in our cohousing series following our team member as she develops her own cohousing scheme.