Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Government proposes the biggest change to the way companies are registered and overseen for more than 150 years

29 May 2019

Consultation raises the prospect of greater company compliance requirements in future

Earlier this month, the government released a consultation on proposals for what purports to be the biggest change to the way companies are registered and overseen for more than 150 years.

This comes against the background of the government's Industrial Strategy, ever-increasing international anti-money laundering requirements, and a commitment to maintain the UK's reputation as a good place to do business post-Brexit.

The proposals put out for consultation include:

  • Identification checks for directors, 'people with significant control' and those who file information at Companies House.

  • Asking for more personal information relating to shareholders.

  • Additional rights for directors to withhold their personal information from public view.

  • Imposing a limit on the number of directorships an individual can hold.

  • Extending powers to check information before and after it has been submitted to Companies House.

  • Checking information against information held by other government departments/agencies.

  • Improving the procedure for delivering annual accounts.

  • Requiring the disclosure of some banking information.

  • Increasing Companies House fees, although the government is keen to emphasise that they are, and will remain, modest by international standards.

Overall, the proposals, no matter how many may be implemented, seem likely to increase the compliance burden on private clients using corporate entitles, and their professional advisers.  We can also perhaps expect a more assertive Companies House in future.  However, the proposals do attempt to smooth out some genuine deficiencies in the way companies are registered, which would make publically-available company information easier to interpret.

It does not seem that there will be any substantial reform to the 'people with significant control' reporting regime introduced in 2016.

Thankfully, the government recognises that increasing the remit of Companies House will require an increase in staff.

Wrigleys Solicitors will track the progress of the proposals, and continues to be well-placed to advise on the use of corporate entities by private clients.

Joseph Thompson View Biography

Joseph Thompson

Solicitor
Leeds

12 Aug 2020

ECJ provides directions on determining a ‘worker’ for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations

Court identifies significant factors for a tribunal to consider when determining employment status.

11 Aug 2020

After Results Day – student data subject access requests

We look at how students might request grading information from schools and colleges following results day and how to deal with such requests.

10 Aug 2020

What is the status and duty of members of an academy trust?

A court case has confirmed that members of charitable companies are fiduciaries and owe duties as such. We look at what this means for academy trusts.