EAT shows a number of factors decide when TUPE applies
In the recent case of ALNO (UK) Ltd v Turner the EAT stressed the need to apply the “multi-factorial” test established in an earlier TUPE case.
This case emphasises that in any business transfer case falling under reg.3(1)(a) (as opposed to a service provision change under reg.3(1)(b)), the multi-factorial approach in Cheesman v R Brewer Contracts Ltd must always be applied.
Dr John McMullen considers the case in his article for Personnel Today here
Previous posts
You can view an archive of John's previous posts for Personnel Today here
Case report
|
If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article further, please contact the Employment Team on 0113 244 6100. You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys employment team on Twitter The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors |
