Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Will safeguarding responsibilities trump an agreed reference?

04 September 2014

Yes – says the High Court in the case of Camurat v Thurrock Borough Council (July 2014)

Comment

This case assists schools who have agreed a reference with an ex-employee, but are then called to exercise their statutory duty to provide information for safeguarding purposes to the police and other bodies.

Some practical advice to employers, in particular schools, academies and colleges, is set out below.

Facts summary

During Mr Camurat's employment by the Council at the school there had been a number of allegations relating to the inappropriate use of force by him during his dealings with pupils. The Judge stressed that there were no suggestions of sexual connotations or impropriety on Mr Camurat's part.

Following a final written warning in 2008, Mr Camurat agreed to leave the school under a compromise agreement (or settlement agreement as they are now known), which included an agreed reference.

After Mr Camurat had left, the Council referred him to the Independent Safeguarding Authority (the ISA eventually decided he should not be barred from working with children) and provided information to the police confirming the misconduct allegations that had been made during his employment. The police reproduced this information in an Enhanced Criminal Record Check (ECRC) for Mr Camurat.  Mr Camurat claimed that the ECRC caused him to lose a new teaching job and continuing losses.

Mr Camurat brought various claims against the Council, including for breach of contract (in relation to a breach of the compromise agreement), negligence, misrepresentation and malicious falsehood.

Decision

The High Court held that the compromise agreement could not require the Council to 'decline a request by the police or anybody interested in safeguarding issues or to limit itself to a mere repetition of what is in [the compromise agreement]'.  The Council as employer was under a statutory duty to provide disclosure for safeguarding purposes and it would be neglecting its duty if it restricted itself to the reference in the compromise agreement.  Any such restriction would, therefore, be void.

The case may not end here as Mr Camurat has been given permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Practical  Advice

We advise employers to consider these drafting points:

  • reserve a right in any settlement agreement that allows the employer to disclose information that they may be obligated to disclose under any statutory duty. As well as safeguarding information, this may also include information legitimately requested by HMRC.
  • an obligation of confidentiality (whether as part of a settlement agreement or otherwise) should not be drafted in a way which may limit the employer's ability to defend itself against any claim which may be brought by or involve an ex-employee.
  • a confidentiality agreement will not restrict an employee (including a former employee) from whistleblowing, or limit the protection given to such employees by whistleblowing legislation against any detriment.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article further, please contact Sue King on 0113 204 5708 or sue.king@wrigleys.co.uk

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors

 September 2014

 

Sue King View Biography

Sue King

Partner
Leeds

27 Nov 2020

Can the Court of Protection save my means tested benefits after I inherit?

LMS a 21 year old with Sotos Syndrome, significant autism and some learning disability lacked the capacity to manage her own finances.

25 Nov 2020

Are workers protected after refusing to work because of health and safety fears?

High Court: UK has failed to implement EU law protecting workers from detriment on health and safety grounds.

24 Nov 2020

Financial recovery post-COVID: What is next for IHT & CGT?

Proposed reforms to IHT & CGT: How might the government balance its books in the long term & attempt to recover some of the financial costs of COVID?