Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Send us an enquiry
Close

Council intervention in matrimonial settlement resisted

21 March 2014

Wrigleys Community Care team advised a matrimonial solicitor concerning a proposed settlement of matrimonial property in ancillary relief proceedings

This matter involved the settlement of capital by the Respondent into a trust where the applicant lived in a care home supported by the local authority.

The council argued that by signing a consent order in the ancillary relief proceedings agreeing that her claim could be settled in this way, and as a result no property coming to her direct, the applicant was depriving herself of an asset for care fees purposes.

Having given advice, Wrigleys were asked to argue the legal issue with the council. The council dropped its claim with the result that proper provision could be made for the client.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of Wrigleys Community Care services further, please contact Lynne Bradey on 0114 267 5584.

Further information about Wrigleys Community Care services is available here

Disclaimer: The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors

 
 

 

 
 
04 Jun 2025
Alacoque Marvin Headshot

Martyn’s Law: What academy trusts need to know

Preparing schools for new security duties under the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025.

29 May 2025
Marie-Louise Hamilton Headshot

Celebrating five promotions across Wrigleys Solicitors

We’re delighted to announce five well-earned promotions, reflecting our commitment to nurturing expertise and supporting career progression.

22 May 2025
 Alexandria Evans Headshot

Part-time worker claims: part-time status must be the “sole reason” for less favourable treatment, EAT confirms

In this article, we look at the recent case of Mireku v London Underground Ltd [2025] EAT 57 and its impact on less favourable treatment claims.