Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

British Airways Data Breach: ICO issue first public intention to fine under the GDPR

July 2019

The ICO has taken action against British Airways under the GDPR. We look at the facts of the case and implications for charities & social enterprises.

The Information Commissioner's Office ("ICO") have announced their intention to fine British Airways more than £180m, following an attack on their website which may have exposed the personal data of more than 500,000 people. A further notification of the ICO's intention to fine the hotel chain Marriott International more than £99m for a cyber security breach was issued by the ICO the following day.

These are the first fines to be publicised by the ICO since it gained increased powers of enforcement following the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR").

British Airways Data Breach: What's happened?

British Airways suffered what it called a "sophisticated, malicious criminal attack" on its website. Users booking with the airline's website were diverted to a fraudulent site, following which their personal information was harvested unlawfully. It is thought that the scam had been taking place for three months from June to September 2018 and that over 500,000 people may have had their personal data compromised.

British Airways notified the ICO, the UK's data protection authority, of the data breach following its discovery and the ICO commenced an investigation into the data breach.

What are the conclusions of the ICO's investigation?

Following its investigation, the ICO has published an intention to fine British Airways £183.39m.

The ICO found that British Airways had poor security arrangements for log-in details, contact information, payment details and booking information.

British Airways and data protection authorities from other EU countries whose residents have been affected by the breach now have the opportunity to make representations to the ICO following the conclusion of the investigation before the fine is formally issued.

Why is the proposed fine against British Airways so big?

This is the first fine the ICO has publicised under the GDPR. Fines under the old rules were capped at £500,000. The maximum fine which can be issued under the GDPR is the greater of €20m or 4% of the organisation's global turnover. The BBC have reported that this fine is set at a level of 1.5% of British Airways' global turnover for 2017.

The ICO's message here is clear. As Elizabeth Denham, the Information Commissioner, summarises, "when you are entrusted with personal data you must look after it". As was widely predicted, the ICO appears to be flexing its enhanced enforcement powers early to send a clear message to organisations that they must take data protection seriously. 

What does this mean for my organisation?

Many charities and social enterprises will be concerned with the level of the fine. Whilst it is important to remember that this fine is based on British Airways' turnover, and so the vast majority of charities and social enterprises will not face fines anywhere near this amount – many fines issued under the new regime are likely to significantly affect the financial viability of many such organisations, and also their reputation.

The key messages from this investigation are the importance data security and the confirmation that the ICO will hold organisations to account even if they are not primarily culpable for a data breach (as is the case with cyber crime). Organisations should ensure that they have adequate procedures in place to safeguard the information they hold, particularly where that information contains payment and other sensitive personal information which could be exploited by a malicious third party.

The case is also a timely reminder to periodically review the data protection measures and documentation organisations have put in place and to check whether they could be strengthened or adjusted to reflect best practice.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of this article further, please contact Nick Dunn, Peter Parker or any other member of the Charities team on 0113 244 6100.

You can also keep up to date by following Wrigleys Charities on Twitter here

The information in this article is necessarily of a general nature. Specific advice should be sought for specific situations. If you have any queries or need any legal advice please feel free to contact Wrigleys Solicitors

 

 

Peter Parker View Biography

Peter Parker

Partner
Leeds

Nick Dunn View Biography

Nick Dunn

Solicitor
Leeds

11 Nov 2019

Employee dismissed for refusing to go full-time was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against on grounds of sex

Employee made redundant after employer refused to allow her to continue to job share.

07 Nov 2019

Election 2019 Manifestos – What Can Schools Expect?

We look here at the manifesto pledges schools can expect to see ahead of the General Election on 12th December.