Website Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website.
See our cookie policy for more information.

Practice Areas

More Information

thepartners@wrigleys.co.uk

Leeds: 0113 244 6100

Sheffield: 0114 267 5588

FOLLOW WRIGLEYS:

Intestacy Rules – Adam's Story

Adam and Bethany had been married for ten years. They had two children; Chrissy aged 9 and Daniel aged 6. Adam also had a child, Emily (aged 18) from a previous relationship. Adam and Emily were estranged.

Tragically, Adam was involved in a car accident and died. He and Bethany had never got around to making Wills, assuming that everything would pass to the surviving spouse, automatically on first death. Bethany approached Wrigleys for help following Adam's death.

The first step was to establish the assets within Adam's estate. It transpired that Adam and Bethany's family home was owned by Adam in his sole name, as he had bought the property before he met Bethany. Although they had talked about transferring the property into joint names once they were married, they had been put off by the cost of doing so. Five years ago, Adam received a substantial inheritance from his grandmother. After paying off the outstanding mortgage, he and Bethany divided the balance and invested in ISAs. Adam had a life policy, but upon contacting the life assurance company, it was discovered that the policy was not written into trust and therefore fell into Adam's estate. The couple also held a joint bank account covering monthly outgoings, and Adam owned his own car and golf equipment.

We explained to Bethany that the joint bank account passed by survivorship to her as sole surviving co-owner. She contacted the bank directly and upon production of a death certificate, they transferred the account into Bethany's sole name.

We calculated the assets falling into Adam's estate, to be distributed in accordance with the intestacy rules were as follows:-

Property

£250,000

ISA accounts

£90,480

Life policy

£100,000

Personal chattels

£10,000

Gross estate

£450,480

Less funeral expenses

£2,480

Net estate

£448,000

We had to break the news to Bethany that the intestacy rules did not allow her to inherit the whole estate of £448,000.

As Adam died after 6th February 2020, we explained to Bethany that a change to the intestacy rules meant that she was entitled to receive the first £270,000 of Adam's estate (known as the Statutory Legacy), as opposed to £250,000, which would have been the case if Adam died earlier in the year.

Adam's estate would therefore be distributed as follows:-

Bethany

Statutory legacy of £270,000   plus personal chattels (valued at £10,000) and half of the remaining estate   i.e. £84,000*

Emily

£28,000**

Chrissy

£28,000** to be held by   trustees until Chrissy reaches 18

Daniel

£28,000** to be held by   trustees until Daniel reaches 18

*£448,000 - £270,000 - £10,000 = £168,000. £168,0000 ÷ 2 = £84,000

**£84,000 ÷ 3 = £28,000

We explained to Bethany that she must apply for a Grant of Letters of Administration in order to access the assets within the estate. As Chrissy and Daniel were under the age of 18, their interests were classed as minority interests, meaning that the Grant had to be issued to two individuals. Bethany and Emily therefore needed to apply for the Grant together. We traced Emily, corresponded with her and submitted the application.

When it came to distribution, we calculated the interest Bethany was entitled to on her statutory legacy of £270,000, and therefore adjusted the amounts due to Emily, Chrissy and Daniel accordingly.

Bethany also provided Wrigleys with Will instructions, to ensure that she did not have to rely on the intestacy rules to decide the fate of her estate.

Jane Netting View Biography

Jane Netting

Direct Line: 0114 267 5621

Partner
Sheffield

Emma Irons View Biography

Emma Irons

Direct Line: 0114 267 5588

Solicitor
Sheffield

Meet the team

19 Feb 2020

Unfair dismissal: whose reason is it anyway?

When the decision-maker's reason for dismissal is not the real reason.

12 Feb 2020

Budget 2020 predictions - what should we expect?

Here we consider what tax policy announcements we might expect in Sajid Javid’s first budget on 11 March 2020.

11 Feb 2020

Employment tribunal: a philosophical belief that men and women cannot change their sex is not protected

Judge finds views were incompatible with human decency and conflicted with the fundamental rights of others.